patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

How Pinkwashing is Hijacking Breast Cancer Awareness

If you've stepped into any grocery or superstore lately, you likely noticed an onslaught of "pinkwashed" products. Pink packaging. Pink-themed products. Pink ribbons. You get the drift.

You probably thought this was pretty benign at first. Who could argue with spreading breast cancer awareness? Isn't it nice to see a bit of corporate responsibility?

Then you see something like Mike's Hard Pink Lemonade, and you start to question what's going on here.

Mike's may as well have printed an image of Fonzie from Happy Days on water skis on its six-packs. Pink water skis, of course. Because this is a prime example of how breast cancer awareness has "jumped the shark."

For those unfamiliar with the term, it's "when a brand, design, or creative effort moves beyond the essential qualities that initially defined its success, beyond relevance or recovery" and was christened by an episode of Happy Days, according to Wikipedia.  

As much as I dislike sourcing Wikipedia, this is a spot-on definition for the state of breast cancer awareness in many respects. It's being fueled by the abundance of all those pinkwashed products you're seeing.

What's So Bad About Breast Cancer Awareness?

Before you say I'm being too cynical, let me clarify. I have no problem with companies giving money to charity. Whether it's a portion of sales or a lump sum, I can't argue with these donations. If the company gains a little PR bump or extra sales, so be it. For-profit companies aren't charities. I get it. That isn't why breast cancer awareness jumped the shark.

No, it's when companies pinkwash their products to make them more attractive to consumers, but obscure or manipulate the way purchases actually benefit charities. It's wrong. It's misleading. It's hijacking consumers' good intentions.

Here's how they do it.

Exhibit A: Mike's Hard Pink Lemonade

At a glance, a reasonable person might think a portion of the purchase of Mike's Hard Pink Lemonade benefits a breast cancer charity. If that's the case, Mike's isn't being clear about it.

The six-pack packaging states that Mike's, "will be making a contribution to the Breast Cancer Research Foundation." It doesn't say if that means a portion of the purchase or a lump sum. The website Mike's set up for this product doesn't make it clear, either. Go ahead, try to find specifics here.

But hey, the drink is pink. Your purchase must be doing some good, right? It's not like a company would make a single donation to charity to justify pinkwashing their products in the hopes consumers bought them over non-pinkwashed competitors?

Although I can't demonstrate this is happening with Mike's, it's not out of the question. Here's an example.

Exhibit B: Prima Pasta Butternut Squash Ravioli

There used to be a pink package of Prima Pasta Butternut Squash Ravioli in my freezer. Then I ate it. That was a good lunch.

Not as tasty is the fine print on the pink packaging. It reads, "Pasta Prima is donating $20,000, regardless of purchase, to The Breast Cancer Research Foundation."

Zero percent of my purchase went to charity. It didn't matter if I'd bought one or 100 packages. Pasta Prima would still donate $20,000. Dansko, a shoe company, pulled a similar stunt in 2010, according to ThinkBeforeYouPink.org.

So why wash the ravioli package in pink? Is it because, like Mike's, the color stands out on the shelf? That it tempts consumers' sense of philanthropy? I suspect this is the case.

At least squash ravioli is somewhat healthy, unlike...

Exhibit C: Velveeta Cheesy Skillets Ultimate Cheeseburger Mac

Take a moment to scroll to the photo gallery attached to this article. You won't believe me. That's right, now you can eat Velveeta Cheesy Skillets Ultimate Cheeseburger Mac "for the cure."

Starting to get the picture? Feeling a little cynical?

Let's put aside for a minute that this product isn't a ringing endorsement for healthy living. The back of the package states, "Kraft Velveeta Cheesy Skillets is supporting the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc. in its mission to save lives through early detection." It also lists information about early detection.

The detection information is worthy. I'll give them that. But how much is Kraft donating through its support? Would my purchase benefit this charity?

It's not clear, and that's suspicious. I can't find information anywhere online about how much is being donated. Feel free to post a link in the comments if you do.

That pink ribbon on the front could win the tie between two similar "meal helpers." Shoppers' charitable instincts are being manipulated to drive sales. This is a marketing trick.

Back to the nutrition thing. The bizarre phenomenon of breast cancer charities partnering with not-so-healthy food businesses is nothing new. In 2010, KFC partnered with the Susan G. Komen for the Cure. They launched the Buckets for the Cure program. KFC donated 50 cents from the sale of each pink bucket of chicken, for a total of $4,249,539.

Although that money may have been spent on research, let's not kid ourselves. It's absurd for a fast food chain to partner with a health-related charity. That's like having a cigarette company partner with oxygen tank manufacturers to fund throat cancer research.

So why go through with it? Why risk leaving a bad taste (no pun intended) in consumers' mouths?

I think you know why.

At least it's possible to follow the money with the Buckets for the Cure debacle. Unlike...

Exhibit D: Panera Bread's Pink Ribbon Bagel

For Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Panera Bread rolled out the Pink Ribbon Bagel. It's pretty tasty, according to Panera's website and to me.

Panera's website also states here that "a portion of proceeds go to benefit breast cancer charities" and to "see your neighborhood bakery-cafe for details about donation amount and the breast cancer charity."

I went to my local Panera to get more information. A flyer there states that a portion of Pink Ribbon Bagel proceeds will benefit Susan G. Komen for the Cure Minnesota.

Since neither the flyer or the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Minnesota website states how much, I asked the folks at my local Panera about the donation amount per purchase.

One person said 10 cents, but wasn't sure. Another person backed this up. About not being sure.

Seem a little strange to you? Panera went through all this trouble to come up with a great-tasting bagel, some promotional material and a page on its corporate website. But for some reason it forgets to mention exactly how much is being donated.

Again, it's consumers' well-meaning purchasing power that is being focused upon, not donating to charity. Because if it was, there'd be no problem finding clear donation information.

Exhibit E: Me

Why should I care so much about these things? Am I gaining anything? Or am I just another Internet troll?

In 2010, someone saved my life by donating her kidney to me. Not a day goes by that I don't realize how lucky I am.

I know what it feels like to be diagnosed with a life-threatening disease. How breaking the news to family and friends is even worse than the phone call from my doctor. I know how challenging it is to maintain hope before things get better.

I bet breast cancer patients can relate.

I put time and energy into raising funds for charities important to me. I know what's at stake. There are lives on the line. I can't stand to see the way pinkwashing has hijacked the good intentions of the breast cancer movement.

Let's be educated consumers. Make sure our hard-earned money is getting to the right people: Cancer patients and their families. Everything else is just noise.

What You Can Do

Here's my litmus test for navigating the pinkwashed tides at the grocery and superstores.

1) Is it clear how much of a purchase goes toward charity?

2) How much of that donation is spent on tangible things like research? Remember, awareness is a means, not an end.

If you can answer those questions, you'll be in a better position to make an educated purchase.

Like I said, there's nothing wrong with companies partnering with charities. They just need to do it responsibly and transparently.

The best way to send that message is with our dollars. Let's use our purchasing power to show how fed up we are with disingenuous pinkwashing.

Either that or we'll come up with a special kind of pink-themed toliet paper to wipe this mess up. Because it's not like things have gotten so ridiculous that some company beat us to the punch already. Right?

Oh, wait.

Benjamin Sobieck

6:24 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Breast Cancer Action, which coined the term "pinkwashing" and operates the website ThinkBeforeYouPink.org, sent me a note to clarify its definition of the word. It's different from the one I used in this article. Here's the definition from BCA's Zoe Christopher:

"Pinkwashers are companies that use the pink ribbon to indicate they care about breast cancer, but make products containing carcinogens, or ingredients linked to breast cancer. The term does not refer to how purchases benefit charities or where the money actually goes, which is another issue altogether."

The one I used came from me and is based on my perception of how people interpret the term colloquially:

"When companies pinkwash their products to make them more attractive to consumers, but obscure or manipulate the way purchases actually benefit charities."

In that context, "pinkwash" means to "use pink colors or pink ribbons associated with breast cancer in product presentation."

-Ben

Reply

Benjamin Sobieck

10:01 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

If you want to dive deep into the issues brought up in this article, check out the movie, "Pink Ribbons, Inc." I found it on Netflix.

If you prefer your complex, thought-provoking issues wrapped up into a satirical short story, click "Maynard Soloman & the Bull$hit Cancer Awareness Campaign" for the Amazon Kindle.

Reply

William 'Bill' DeBerg

11:00 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

thanks for posting this. This isnt the only issue that people do this on either but the pink thing is becoming a little ridiculous you are right

Reply

Pat

6:58 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I am all for whatever corporations will do to raise funds for breast cancer awareness, or any other worthy cause. I like to support companies that do good deeds (there are many!), and am sad to be made aware of the "pink washing" for purely advertising gimmicks, as you have defined Benjamin.

A perfect example outside of corporations is in politics right now. Right in our own neighborhood! Representative Joe Atkins has numerous times said he wasn't going to fund raise during the month of October, in respect for breast cancer awareness. I figured that it was a ploy, and that he probably already had raised the limits allowed in a state house race. But now I learn that not only was it one of his "do good" tricks, it's an actual lie! He sent out a fund raising plea, IN OCTOBER, claiming he desperately needed MORE MONEY to beat his opponent. Never mind he already has tens of thousands of dollars more in his account than he can legally spend this election cycle (you can check this at the Campaign Finance website!). So he is a fraud in his pink washing. And a fraud in his need for more and more campaign funds. Typical politican. This adds to the cheapening of the all the good that the pink ribbon does.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daisy Chene

7:39 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@pat - is this really true? Atkins has always seemed to be such a nice guy.

Benjamin Sobieck

7:33 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@William You're right, we've seen this same "washing" applied with other colors, too. Green (environmental) and red (AIDS), for example. It's better just to donate directly to your favorite charities. You can even earmark the money sometimes to make sure it's going to the programs you support.

Reply

Pat

8:04 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yes, Daisy. I am afraid it is. My friend, who gives a lot of money to people in politics, was just telling me the other night about the email he got from Rep. Atkins (he was surprised that Rep. Atkins needed more money). I have no reason to doubt him about this. Kind of makes you rethink what the public persona has been, and who the real politician is. Sorry to have highjacked this important thread with local politics, Benjamin.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Benjamin Sobieck

8:18 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

No problem, talk about whatever you'd like!

The Twilight Clone

8:51 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I think the Mike's Hard Lemonade ribbon is especially ironic considering that alcohol is a risk factor for breast cancer.

Reply

Leave a comment