patching...
Poll: Who Has the Best Outdoors Patio in Hopkins? Vote Now! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

(UPDATED) Santorum Edges Out Paul for Hopkins Vote

A two-vote difference separated the candidates in the community.

 

(UPDATED: 9:36 a.m. Feb. 8) Rick Santorum slipped past Ron Paul in the Hopkins Republican presidential preference contest Tuesday at Alice Smith Elementary.

Santorum collected 55 votes to Paul’s 53 in the community.

Exact Hopkins precinct tallies weren’t immediately available. But Romaine Bechir, a member of the Senate District 44 Republican executive committee, said a large number of young people in Hopkins Precinct 6 who cast votes for Paul kept the race close.

Social issues accounted for much of the divide between Santorum and Paul supporters. Both sides agreed on the need to reign in spending and decrease the size of government. But Paul supporters spoke of the need to stay out of people’s personal lives, while Santorum’s backers praised his conservative values.

Larry Mandile, a salesman for a courier company, was one of those. Mandile described himself as a “very pro-life” voter who backed Santorum. He said he showed up at Tuesday’s caucus meetings to have his voice heard.

“It’s part of being an American, “ he said. “I think it’s just a good thing to get involved.”

The values sentiment was evident in the resolutions discussed at the caucuses. Hopkins voters were especially displeased with Pres. Barack Obama’s mandate that health insurance include birth control. The policy applies to religious organizations that do not have an exclusively religious purpose—such as Catholic hospitals and charities—but does not apply to churches.

Bechir attributed that particular issue to the significant number of Catholics in Hopkins.

Foreign policy was another mark of division. Andrew Duneman—a Precinct 4 voter who owns an online retail business—applauded Paul’s position on avoiding foreign entanglements.

“Basically, he’s the only guy who practices what he preaches, I think,” Duneman said after the conclusion of the caucus.

Yet critics charged that Paul’s vision is unrealistic when the United States depends so much on foreign energy sources.

“Mr. Paul scares me,” a man only identified as Tom told his precinct. “That’s the only problem I have with him right now is the foreign policy.”

The split wasn’t just between Santorum and Paul. Mitt Romney backers answered questions about the former Massachusetts governor’s actions while in office. Other comments were more pointed.

“I’m an old lady that has been around a long time and raised eight kids and homeschooled for 12 years,” one unidentified woman said before speaking approvingly of Santorum’s family values. “Mitt Romney has a different set of values with his church.”

Romney, widely viewed as the Republican frontrunner, trailed in both Hopkins and the statewide race.

Although Paul kept the race close in Hopkins, Santorum dominated the statewide contest.

With 97 percent of precincts reporting in Wednesday morning, he had 45 percent of the vote to Paul’s 27 percent, Romney’s 17 percent and Gingrich's 11 percent.

Regardless of how their individual candidates fared, Hopkins caucus goers said they were pleased with the night’s activities.

“You should stand up and speak,” said Duneman, adding that he was silent at his first caucus in 2008. “I really think at the caucuses your vote means a whole lot more than it does in November.”

***

Hopkins GOP Totals

Candidate Total votes
Newt Gingrich 22
Ron Paul 53
Mitt Romney 24
Rick Santorum 55
Related Topics: Hopkins caucus, Minnesota Caucus, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, and election 2012

PaulBot2012

5:37 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

“Mr. Paul scares me,” a man only identified as Tom told his precinct. “That’s the only problem I have with him right now is the foreign policy.”

Tom is another one of those people who repeats what they hear on the news instead of actually reading into Paul's foreign policy. Nothing scary about wanting to stop funding both sides of conflicts going on in the middle east with taxpayer money. I'd say our current policy of doing just that is what's scary.

Tom should read about blowback. You know like the 19 American imprisoned in Egypt because we propped up a dictator too long with billions in taxpayer money. Or like people murdered by Saddam, a man we put in power and sold weapons to.

And let's talk about intervention in foreign conflict for a second here. The question about Syria has been asked a lot lately, about what the US should do about 1000s of civilians being slaughtered by a dictator. Same thing we used as a reason to go to war with Iraq. Iraqi freedom. Except, when we start willy nilly dropping bombs in the name of freedom, those people we are "freeing" end up dead by the 1000s to 100s of 1000s. Then we get the unfortunate blowback of the entire muslim world hating America.

If everyone takes a closer look at Ron Paul, we'll have a real honest president in office that gets us back on track!

RON PAUL 2012!

Reply

Jennifer Oakley

6:13 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Just who is going to raise and pay for all these babies we'll be churning out under a Santorum rule?

What's scary is that Santorum and his bible banging cult followers consider abortion murder but jump up and down at the chance to go to war to murder masses of people.

That's why I left the church when I was a young teenager. I couldn't deal with the hypocricy and the fact that churches, in general, eslaved the weak minded, the people who couldn't think or do for themselves.

Reply

Leave a comment