patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hopkins Prepares to Vote on Unite Edina Detachment Request

The Hopkins School Board will decide whether to support the request Thursday.

 

Edina residents who live in Hopkins school district boundaries only have to wait a few more days to find out whether the School Board will support their request to leave for the Edina school district.

The Hopkins School Board will vote Thursday on a request from Parkwood Knolls and Walnut Drive property owners who want to leave the Hopkins school district because they think its schools are not in locations that serve the families’ educational needs.

School district administrators will first report on their findings and present analysis from a Nov. 29 study that concluded that detachment would cost Hopkins more than $550,000 in lost revenue.

After the presentation, School Board directors will vote on the detachment request.

Click the PDFs above to review several of the documents that the board will consider.

 

A long process

The detachment discussions started as early as October 2010—when Alan Koehler, who’s spearheading the efforts of advocacy group Unite Edina 273, and other residents presented a detachment request to the district superintendent.

The School Board discussed that request at a subsequent work session. However, the process didn’t really start in earnest until the spring of 2012, when Edina Rep. Keith Downey introduced a bill that would let the property owners change districts without Hopkins School Board approval.

That bill died, but Unite Edina 273 supporters made a presentation to the School Board on Sept. 20 then delivered about 425 petitions to the superintendent’s office Sept. 28.

That launched the—initially uncertain—process leading to Thursday’s vote. Along the way, the group made presentations to the district’s Citizens Financial Advisory Committee (CFAC)  and the board’s Policy Monitoring Committee.

Unite Edina has faced a skeptical audience throughout the process. CFAC member Kip Heegaard asked if Unite Edina had approached families in apartment complexes near the area that wants to detach. Dave Koppe asked why they weren’t trying to bring all of Edina into Edina schools.

“I’ve got many phone calls from many people in many neighborhoods (saying) ‘What does Unite Edina mean? Does that mean all of Edina?’” said School Board Treasurer Wendy Donovan: “So when we say ‘Unite Edina,’ it’s really not uniting Edina. It’s uniting your part of Edina.”

Meanwhile, the Nov. 29 study emphasized the financial impact on the district—and on both the property owners who would be left behind and the property owners who would be leaving.

The Unite Edina property owners counter that Hopkins is better off than the district they want to join and that their departure would have minimal impact on Hopkins’ finances. They say their request is about neighborhood schools and sense of community—not money.

“When people come into Edina, they want to be part of the Edina community,” homeowner Pam Allen told CFAC on Oct. 24.

Related Topics: District 270, District 273, Edina Public Schools, Hopkins Public Schools, Unite Edina, and Unite Edina 273

Maury Ballsteen

10:09 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Between this tragic saga, and the hard hitting jounalism presented by the Star Tribune about the "storied" Edina Hornettes dance team, it is admiriable how the residents of Edina continue to stand up against the rest of the world. They are clearly a beacon that shows you if you have wealth and the luxury of time, you can force your worldview upon anyone. That you can make your passionate beliefs about non issues appear on the forefront of everyone's mind. That you can fill your days not only fighting against opression but also having the ability to manufacture opression so that you have something to fight!!! These residents are a shining example of American Exceptionalism. Why move from a school district when you can have the school distric move around you?!?!?! Bravo Edina!!!! You shall overcome!!!! Clearly shipping your children out of Hopkins and into private schools was a victory only measured by moral standards. And if we know anything about Edina, we know that moral victories (and possibly logic) don't really count for much.

It is incredibly comforting for the rest of us to see that you have not changed, that you have become more senial, and not wiser, with age. That you continue to pursue your fight in spite of your victory. Because that is why we think Edina is so 'special', that no matter what, you will always continue to act, and behave like petchulant children.

Reply

J. Bergman

1:16 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

The previous writer (Maury Ballsteen) is so hateful. In spite of his numerous spelling errors, he manages to convey the fact that he has prejudged a large group of people, simply because of where they live.

Why is it so bad that these parents want to send their children to nearby schools? It would be better for the environment, and better for the children.

And why should the Hopkins school board be allowed to hold children hostage for no reason other than money?

Reply
Comment_arrow

A. Funk

1:56 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Dear J. Bergman, No one is holding anyone "hostage." If you want to live in the Edina School District, it's okay for you to purchase a house there.

J. Bergman

2:22 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

A. Funk said that, "No one is holding anyone 'hostage.'" Meanwhile, here is the situation:

Over 98% of Parkwood Knolls residents signed a petition stating that they want to leave the Hopkins school district. Yet the Hopkins school board has been saying it will not allow the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood to leave the district, unless it can come up with a way to make up for $500,000 in property tax revenue.

That sounds a little like a hostage situation to me.

By the way, doesn't it seem odd that the Hopkins school board collects $500,000 in property taxes from Parkwood Knolls residents while only educating 9 children from the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood?

Reply

Fred

6:52 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Maury, Maury, Maury,

Don't you love a guy with double standards...

From comments section on a June 25, 2012 article in the Hopkins Patch covering the Twin Cities Gay Pride Festival -

Maury Ballsteen
4:19 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Quote

"Voicing an opinion without looking at the pictures or reading the article seems strange. If you can't say anything nice, why say anything at all?

Also, don't get defensive when people question your knowledge on a topic when you admit you skipped over any attempt to understand the subject."

End quote.

Maury, please send everyone a list of those causes that you support and those that you do not so we know when it is fair game to make negative childish comments and when it is not.

All the best,

Petchulant Child

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maury Ballsteen

10:41 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Fred,

I apologize. I assumed that the distinction between hate speech and satire would be clear. I guess I was wrong.

My sarcasm was merely an attempt to capture the ridiculousness of the group “Unite Edina 273” and their platform.

And J. Let’s calm down with the term ‘hostage situation.’ You clearly don’t grasp what that means. I think the term you are looking for would be similar to gerrymandering, which is what people do when they want to shift invisible boundaries around to best suit their needs and wants.

Patch_comments_icon

James Warden

10:49 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Y'all may be interested in this story just published:

http://hopkins.patch.com/articles/what-role-does-wealth-play-in-edina-request-to-leave-hopkins-schools

Take a look at the demographics and share your thoughts: Are they even relevant to the discussion?

Reply

Leave a comment